Toner — Second District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Anthony Steven Toner v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
LaROSE; MORRIS; LABRIT
Date Decided
September 18, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2167
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Anthony Steven Toner appealed from the County Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Robert Dittmer presided.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the nature of the decision under review, the arguments raised on appeal, or the offense, if any, involved in the case.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam disposition without a written explanation of its reasoning. Judges LaRose, Morris, and Labrit concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the decision under review.
  • The opinion provides no facts, legal analysis, or explanation for the result.
  • The opinion does not identify the precise nature of the underlying ruling.

Why It Matters

The disposition ends this appeal with the county court’s decision left undisturbed. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues that may have been presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top