Torres-Eusebio — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Alfredo Torres-Eusebio v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
TRAVER, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); MIZE, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2022); Kamoutsas, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
October 27, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-1684
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Alfredo Torres-Eusebio appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Orange County in lower-tribunal case number 2022-CF-011594-B-O. Circuit Judge Jenifer M. Harris presided below.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the arguments raised on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. The opinion therefore states no legal reasoning and resolves no identified issue beyond leaving the judgment below in place.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Orange County circuit court’s judgment.
  • The decision was unanimous among Chief Judge Traver and Judges Mize and Kamoutsas.
  • The opinion supplies no facts, legal analysis, or explanation for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends this stage of Torres-Eusebio’s appeal while leaving the lower court’s judgment intact. Because the appellate court provided no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues that may have been presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top