Tran v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Lam A. Tran v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Nardella; White; Pratt
Date Decided
September 29, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-0666
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance, Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Lam A. Tran appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Orange County, where Circuit Judge Vincent S. Chiu presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case as 2021-CF-003333-A-O.

The opinion does not describe the underlying charges, procedural history, appellate arguments, or facts. It states only the disposition of Tran’s appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment. Judges Nardella, White, and Pratt concurred in the per curiam decision.

The court provided no written reasoning and announced no express rule of law. The opinion therefore does not reveal the grounds on which the judgment was affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the judgment against Tran.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a panel consisting of Judges Nardella, White, and Pratt.
  • The opinion contains no factual discussion, legal analysis, or explanation for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the lower court’s judgment in place but supplies no reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Tran’s appeal and the procedural effect of the affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top