Tribbitt — affirmed the trial court without a written explanation

Case
Marcus Tribbitt v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
TRAVER (Ron DeSantis, 2023); NARDELLA (Ron DeSantis, 2023)
Date Decided
July 28, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-0238
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Marcus Tribbitt, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Polk County, where Circuit Judge Michelle O. Pinckett presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case as CF06-003429-XX.

The State was represented on appeal by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Natalia Reyna-Pimiento. The opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the order or judgment challenged, the arguments raised, or the trial court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED” and supplied no legal or factual analysis.

Chief Judge Traver and Judges Nardella and White concurred. Because the court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion establishes only that the challenged result was left in place; it does not identify which issues were considered dispositive or endorse any particular rationale.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Polk County circuit court’s decision.
  • The court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance and did not address Tribbitt’s arguments.
  • The opinion provides no facts, legal standard, or substantive reasoning from which a broader rule can be drawn.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this stage of Tribbitt’s appeal without altering the circuit court’s result. For practitioners, its usefulness is limited because the court did not state a holding on any specific legal issue or explain the basis for affirmance.

The opinion also states that it is not final until the period for filing a motion for rehearing expires and any timely filed rehearing motion is resolved.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top