Tulenko v. State — Sixth District summarily affirmed the circuit court’s decision

Case
Matthew J. Tulenko v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Nardella; White; Gannam
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0841
Topics
Appeal, Per Curiam Decision, Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Matthew J. Tulenko appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Orange County, where Judge Patricia L. Strowbridge presided. The lower-tribunal case number was 2025-CA-000086-O.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). Tulenko represented himself, and the State was represented by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Assistant Attorney General Deborah Chance.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no factual discussion, legal analysis, or explanation for the affirmance. Judges Nardella, White, and Gannam concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Orange County circuit court’s decision.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam disposition consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.”
  • The opinion does not identify the issues raised or explain the basis for the court’s ruling.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written reasoning for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top