Turner v. State — affirmed the county court’s judgment without a written opinion

Case
Scott Richard Turner v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Winokur; Nordby; Long
Date Decided
October 2, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-3237
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Scott Richard Turner appealed from a judgment of the County Court for Levy County, where Judge Luis E. Bustamante presided.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charge, the county court’s ruling, Turner’s appellate arguments, or the State’s response.

The Court’s Holding

The First District affirmed the county court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues raised on appeal. Judges Winokur, Nordby, and Long concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s judgment was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the appellate issues or disclose the factual and legal basis for the result.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s judgment intact but offers no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top