Unison Midgard Holdings — Third District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling without explanation

Case
Unison Midgard Holdings, LLC, etc. v. FirstBank Puerto Rico, etc., et al.
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
Edwin A. Scales, III (Rick Scott, 2013); Monica Gordo (Ron DeSantis, 2019); Alexander S. Bokor (Ron DeSantis, 2020)
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
3D24-2150
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Unison Midgard Holdings, LLC appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in lower-tribunal case number 22-17532-CA-01. Judge Beatrice Butchko Sanchez presided over the circuit-court proceeding.

The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal. Counsel appeared for Unison Midgard Holdings; the appellees made no appearance.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the facts or legal issues. The opinion therefore establishes only that the challenged ruling was affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion identifies no factual or legal basis for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

This is a summary affirmance rather than a reasoned opinion. Because the court did not explain its analysis, the decision offers no articulated rule or rationale for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top