United States Health Agency v. Bueno — affirmed without a written explanation

Case
United States Health Agency, Inc. v. Claudia Bueno
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
KUNTZ (Rick Scott, 2016); SHEPHERD (Ron DeSantis, 2025)
Date Decided
July 16, 2026
Docket No.
4D2024-2450
Topics
Appeal; Cross-Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

United States Health Agency, Inc., doing business as Florida Health Agency, and William B. Kohn appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Claudia Bueno filed a cross-appeal.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues presented, or the arguments raised on appeal and cross-appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision. Chief Judge Kuntz and Judges Shepherd and Lott concurred.

Because the court provided no reasoning, the opinion does not identify any legal rule applied or separately explain its disposition of the appeal and cross-appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment was affirmed.
  • The case involved both an appeal and a cross-appeal.
  • The appellate court issued a one-word per curiam affirmance without discussing the facts or legal issues.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place but offers no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. The opinion also states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top