Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Flores — Appellate court affirms lower court’s judgment in favor of policyholder

Case
Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Armando Flores
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
Fernandez (Rick Scott, 2011); LINDSEY (Rick Scott, 2017)
Date Decided
June 11, 2026
Docket No.
3D24-2086
Topics
Insurance law; Property and casualty insurance; Appeals
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company appealed a judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County in favor of Armando Flores. The appeal was heard by a panel of the Third District Court of Appeal. No written opinion was issued explaining the merits of the dispute or the parties’ respective arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court’s judgment in its entirety. The per curiam affirmation indicates the appellate court found no reversible error in the circuit court’s decision and that the judgment should stand as entered.

Key Takeaways

  • The appellate court upheld the lower tribunal’s judgment favoring the policyholder against the insurer
  • No written opinion was issued, suggesting the court saw no novel legal issues requiring explanation
  • The judgment from Miami-Dade Circuit Court stands as final

Why It Matters

While the opinion provides no reasoning, this affirmation provides finality to the underlying dispute. For Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company, the judgment against it cannot be challenged further absent a motion for rehearing. The decision reinforces the lower court’s determination in this policyholder dispute.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top