Valdez-Gonzales — Florida appellate court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Angel Valdez-Gonzales v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; LaRose; Sleet
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-1195
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Postconviction Proceedings; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Angel Valdez-Gonzales appealed from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Thomas N. Palermo presided.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The opinion does not identify the underlying claims, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the relief Valdez-Gonzales sought.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam decision consisting only of the word “Affirmed.” It supplied no reasoning and announced no express legal rule. Judges Northcutt, LaRose, and Sleet concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no explanation for its affirmance.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying claims or establish an express rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Valdez-Gonzales’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top