Valdez v. Lake Carlton Arms LLP — Second District affirmed the county court’s decision without a written explanation

Case
Madelaine Valdez v. Lake Carlton Arms LLP
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Silberman; Morris; Atkinson
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0324
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Madelaine Valdez appealed a decision of the County Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Marc Soren Makholm presided. The appellee was Lake Carlton Arms LLP.

Valdez represented herself on appeal. Lake Carlton Arms LLP made no appearance. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Judges Silberman, Morris, and Atkinson concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the county court’s decision.
  • The opinion provides no facts, legal analysis, or explanation for the disposition.
  • Valdez proceeded pro se, and the appellee made no appearance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling in place but supplies no written reasoning about the underlying controversy or the legal issues presented. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top