Vernon v. Young — Circuit court’s judgment affirmed without written explanation

Case
William Vincent Vernon, III v. Jackqulyn Shawn Young, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Doris Wright Shaw
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Date Decided
July 9, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3018
Topics
Appeal; Estate/Probate; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

William Vincent Vernon, III appealed a judgment entered by the Marion County Circuit Court (case no. 2023-CP-001191) against him. The appellee, Jackqulyn Shawn Young, is the personal representative of the estate of Doris Wright Shaw. Vernon appeared pro se (representing himself) on appeal, while Young was represented by counsel at StuderZobel Law, PLLC.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam opinion. The court issued a brief order without written explanation of its reasoning, stating only “AFFIRMED.”

Key Takeaways

  • The trial court’s judgment stands unchanged; Vernon’s appeal was unsuccessful.
  • The appellate court did not provide detailed reasoning for its affirmance, which is permissible under Florida appellate procedure.
  • The judgment is not final pending any timely motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

This decision illustrates the appellate process for litigants challenging unfavorable judgments in Florida circuit courts. Brief affirmances by appellate courts are common and indicate the court found no reversible error warranting written explanation.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top