Wakefield — criminal judgment affirmed without a written opinion

Case
John Michael Wakefield v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
LAMBERT (Rick Scott, 2014); Soud (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
July 14, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0419
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

John Michael Wakefield appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Brevard County in lower-tribunal case number 05-2024-CF-13879-A. Circuit Judge Michelle Naberhaus presided below.

The opinion does not describe the charge, the trial-court proceedings, the judgment under review, or Wakefield’s appellate arguments. Wakefield was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision. The court provided no written reasoning and did not identify any issue of law resolved on appeal.

Judges Lambert, Soud, and MacIver concurred. The decision was designated nonfinal until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the judgment under review.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion supplies no facts or legal analysis from which a broader holding can be drawn.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact but offers no precedential analysis or guidance on the underlying legal issues. Its significance is therefore primarily case-specific.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top