Walker — affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Tarrinson Walker v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
LUCAS (Rick Scott, 2014); VILLANTI (Jeb Bush, 2003)
Date Decided
July 17, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0952
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Postconviction Proceedings; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Tarrinson Walker, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Wesley D. Tibbals presided.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The appellate opinion does not identify the claims Walker raised, describe the circuit court’s ruling, or provide additional facts about the underlying case.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam disposition consisting only of the word “Affirmed.” It provided no reasoning, addressed no specific legal issue, and announced no express rule of law. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Villanti and Sleet concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District left the circuit court’s ruling in place.
  • The appeal was decided under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • Because the court gave no written analysis, the opinion does not disclose the issues presented or the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal with the circuit court’s ruling intact. Its practical significance is limited to the parties because the per curiam affirmance offers no explanation that attorneys can apply to other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top