Wallace v. State — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Demetris Wallace v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Winokur; Nordby; Long
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0854
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Demetris Wallace appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Alachua County, where Judge James M. Colaw presided. Wallace represented himself on appeal, and the State of Florida was represented by the attorney general’s office.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues Wallace raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition. Judges Winokur, Nordby, and Long concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. The opinion states only that the lower court’s decision was affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the appellate issues or describe the underlying case.

Why It Matters

The disposition leaves the circuit court’s decision in place but supplies no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top