Ward v. State — Second District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Matthew Walter Ward v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J. (Rick Scott, 2014); Kelly, J. (Jeb Bush, 2001); Atkinson, J. (Rick Scott, 2018)
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-1558
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Postconviction Review; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Matthew Walter Ward appealed from the Circuit Court for Pasco County, where Judge Mary Handsel presided. Ward represented himself on appeal.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2), which governs certain appeals from summary postconviction proceedings. The opinion does not describe Ward’s claims, the underlying conviction, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Kelly and Atkinson concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District left the circuit court’s ruling in place.
  • The appeal was handled under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • Because the court provided no reasoning, the opinion does not identify the issues presented or explain the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal with the circuit court’s ruling intact. Its practical significance is limited by the absence of facts, legal analysis, or an articulated holding beyond affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top