Background
Dominique Warren filed an original proceeding in the Florida First District Court of Appeal seeking a writ of mandamus against the State of Florida.
The court’s two-page opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the relief Warren requested, or the State’s response.
The Court’s Holding
The First District dismissed Warren’s petition.
The court provided no independent analysis and cited only Munn v. Parole Commission, 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), as authority for the dismissal.
Key Takeaways
- The court dismissed the petition for a writ of mandamus.
- The decision was issued per curiam by Judges Rowe, Ray, and Winokur.
- The opinion relied on Munn v. Parole Commission without explaining how that precedent applied.
Why It Matters
The ruling ends this original mandamus proceeding at the First District, subject to any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.
Because the opinion supplies no facts or reasoning beyond its citation to Munn, its broader significance must be assessed by consulting that precedent and the proceeding’s filings.