Warren v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Robert Lee Warren v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J.; Silberman, J.; Morris, J.
Date Decided
October 21, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-2008
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Pro Se Litigation; Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Robert Lee Warren, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Larry Keith Meyer, Jr., presided.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The opinion does not identify the underlying conviction, sentence, claims, or circuit court ruling challenged by Warren.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam disposition consisting only of the word “Affirmed.” It provided no reasoning and announced no express rule of law. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Silberman and Morris concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District left the circuit court’s ruling in place.
  • The court resolved the appeal through a summary per curiam affirmance.
  • Because the opinion contains no analysis, it does not explain why Warren’s challenge failed or establish an express legal holding beyond affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal with the circuit court’s ruling intact, but its lack of reasoning limits its usefulness to attorneys seeking guidance on substantive or procedural questions.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top