Warschaw v. SM Multifamily — Third District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Joshua Warschaw v. SM Multifamily LLC, etc.
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
LOGUE; GORDO; LOBREE
Date Decided
August 20, 2026
Docket No.
3D25-2198
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Joshua Warschaw appealed from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, where Judge Linda Singer Stein presided. The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

Warschaw represented himself. SM Multifamily LLC was represented by Barfield McCain Ayoub, P.A., and Elizabeth S. Rivera.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning, legal analysis, or discussion of the issues. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third District affirmed the county court’s decision.
  • The three-judge panel consisted of LOGUE, GORDO, and LOBREE.
  • Because the opinion contains only the word “Affirmed,” it establishes no stated rationale for the result.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling undisturbed, but the opinion supplies no facts or reasoning that attorneys can apply to other disputes. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of this appeal on the information provided.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top