Waters v. Gore — Second District affirms estate ruling without a written opinion

Case
Lisa Waters v. Kimberly S. Gore and Mark Waters, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of W. Richard Waters, Deceased
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Khouzam; Morris; Guard
Date Decided
September 30, 2026
Docket No.
2D2024-2874
Topics
Probate Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Lisa Waters appealed an order of the Circuit Court for Manatee County in a matter involving the Estate of W. Richard Waters. Kimberly S. Gore and Mark Waters appeared as the estate’s co-personal representatives.

Waters represented herself on appeal. The Second District’s opinion does not identify the challenged order, describe the underlying dispute, or state the arguments raised by the parties.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or legal analysis. Judges Khouzam, Morris, and Guard concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling remains in effect.
  • The appellate court affirmed without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion supplies no factual or doctrinal basis for extending the result to other cases.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal in favor of the estate’s co-personal representatives while leaving the trial court’s ruling intact.

Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion offers practitioners no substantive guidance on probate law or appellate doctrine.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top