Weigly v. State — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Christopher Weigly v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lewis; Bilbrey; Winokur
Date Decided
August 17, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2726
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Christopher Weigly, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Leon County, where Circuit Judge Stephen S. Everett presided.

The appellate opinion does not identify the underlying charges, the order or judgment challenged, the arguments raised, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Judges Lewis, Bilbrey, and Winokur concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District left the circuit court’s decision in place.
  • The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The ruling resolves Weigly’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no written legal analysis. Because the opinion does not disclose the underlying facts or issues, no broader substantive holding can be drawn from it.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top