Wells v. Department of Revenue — affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Travis Lovell Wells v. Department of Revenue O/B/O Celia Walker
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Lambert, J. (Rick Scott, 2014); Kilbane, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
November 3, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0167
Topics
Family Law, Child Support, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Travis Lovell Wells appealed an order from the Circuit Court for Brevard County in a case involving the Florida Department of Revenue acting on behalf of Celia Walker. Circuit Judge Jigisa Dookhoo entered the order under review.

Wells represented himself on appeal. The Department of Revenue was represented by the Florida Attorney General’s Office. The appellate court’s brief opinion did not describe the underlying dispute, the challenged order, the arguments presented, or the trial court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.

Because the opinion contains no legal analysis, it does not identify the issues decided or announce a rule of law. The disposition leaves the challenged judgment or order in place, subject to any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The court provided no factual discussion or legal reasoning for its decision.
  • The opinion does not disclose the specific appellate claims or establish an articulated legal rule.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal with the lower court’s ruling intact unless further authorized review changes the result. Its practical significance is limited to the parties because the court did not explain its reasoning or address a legal question in a written analysis.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top