Wells v. State of Florida — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Derrick James Wells, Jr. v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts; Bilbrey; Nordby
Date Decided
November 4, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0596
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Derrick James Wells, Jr. appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Alachua County, where Judge James M. Colaw presided. Wells represented himself on appeal, while the State was represented by the Florida Attorney General’s Office.

The First District’s opinion does not identify the underlying charges, the ruling challenged, the arguments raised, or the relevant facts.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. Judges Roberts, Bilbrey, and Nordby concurred.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting solely of the word “AFFIRMED.” It provided no reasoning and announced no express rule of law.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in place.
  • The appellate court did not explain the factual or legal basis for affirmance.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Wells’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. Because the opinion omits the underlying facts and issues, no broader substantive holding can fairly be drawn from it.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top