Westenberger — affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Wilma Y. Westenberger v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lewis; Bilbrey; Winokur
Date Decided
August 17, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1092
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Wilma Y. Westenberger appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Columbia County, where Circuit Judge Leandra G. Johnson presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The appellate opinion provides no facts about the underlying case, the issues Westenberger raised, or the circuit court’s reasoning. Westenberger was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the Attorney General’s Office represented the State.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision. Judges Lewis, Bilbrey, and Winokur concurred.

Because the court issued only a one-word affirmance, it did not explain its reasoning, address any appellate argument, or announce a legal rule. The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.
  • The court gave no factual or legal explanation for its decision.
  • The opinion announced no express rule of law or precedential reasoning.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact but offers no guidance about the merits of Westenberger’s arguments or the law governing the case. Its practical significance is therefore limited to the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top