Wharton — First District Court of Appeal affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jason T. Wharton v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Lewis, J.; Winokur, J.
Date Decided
August 17, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2036
Topics
Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jason T. Wharton, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Alachua County, where Judge James M. Colaw presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Lewis and Winokur concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. The opinion states only “AFFIRMED” and notes that the decision is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The three-judge panel issued a per curiam disposition without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion identifies no underlying facts, legal issues, arguments, or authorities.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place, but the opinion supplies no explanation of the legal basis for affirmance. Its text therefore does not establish what issues the panel considered or why the appellant’s challenge failed.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top