White — affirmed in a per curiam opinion without explanatory analysis

Case
Blayze White v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Soud (Ron DeSantis, 2022); Boatwright (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-1965
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Blayze White appealed from the Circuit Court for Marion County, where Judge Timothy T. McCourt presided. The Fifth District identified the lower-tribunal case numbers as 2020-CF-001108-A and 2020-CF-004753-A.

The opinion does not describe the charges, procedural history, issues raised on appeal, or arguments of the parties.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed. The disposition was issued per curiam, with Judges Soud, Boatwright, and Kilbane concurring.

The court provided no analysis or explanation for its decision and did not identify the particular ruling or rulings being affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the matter on appeal.
  • The court issued a written per curiam opinion containing no explanatory analysis.
  • The opinion does not disclose the appellate issues or the factual and legal grounds for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves the appeal in the State’s favor at the Fifth District, subject to disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the underlying legal issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top