White v. State — affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Devin Anthony White v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
NARDELLA (Ron DeSantis, 2023); GANNAM (Ron DeSantis, 2023)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0882
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Devin Anthony White appealed a matter from the County Court for Polk County, where Judge Stacie Kaylor presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case as No. 2024-MM-002549.

The opinion does not describe the underlying allegations, the ruling under review, the arguments raised on appeal, or the procedural history beyond identifying the originating court.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed. Its disposition consists solely of the word “AFFIRMED.”

The court issued the decision per curiam and provided no analysis or explanation for its ruling. Judges Nardella, Gannam, and Kamoutsas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the matter appealed from the Polk County Court.
  • The per curiam opinion provides no facts, legal analysis, or stated basis for the disposition.
  • The opinion was designated not final until the rehearing period expires and any timely rehearing motion is resolved.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves White’s appeal at the Sixth District without a written explanation of the controlling facts or law. Because the opinion supplies no reasoning, it offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues that may have been presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top