Williams v. State — affirmed the circuit court’s order in an unelaborated per curiam opinion

Case
Cordell Najee Williams v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
TRAVER, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Nardella, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Wozniak, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023)
Date Decided
October 13, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1349
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance; Postconviction Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Cordell Najee Williams, proceeding pro se, appealed an order of the Circuit Court for Polk County in lower-tribunal case number 2019-CF-007728. Circuit Judge J. Kevin Abdoney entered the order under review.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The appellate opinion does not describe Williams’s underlying claims, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s order.

The court issued a written per curiam opinion containing only the disposition “AFFIRMED.” It provided no factual discussion, legal analysis, or explanation of its reasoning.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the circuit court’s order.
  • The decision was unanimous, with Chief Judge Traver and Judges Nardella and Wozniak concurring.
  • The opinion did not identify or resolve any specific legal issue in an explanatory analysis.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s order in place but supplies no reasoning for practitioners to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of Williams’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top