Willmeng v. Scheckel — Fourth DCA affirmed the lower court’s decision without written explanation

Case
Dana Ann Willmeng, Brian Richard Poncin, and Gerald G. Poncin, Jr. v. Julianne Scheckel
Court
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District
Date Decided
July 2, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-2294
Topics
Appeal; Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Appellants Dana Ann Willmeng, Brian Richard Poncin, and Gerald G. Poncin, Jr. appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County (Judge Cynthia L. Cox). The underlying case number was 312023CA000963XXXXXX.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court’s decision. The Court issued a per curiam affirmance without written explanation of the underlying facts, claims, or reasoning supporting the affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The lower court’s decision was upheld on appeal.
  • This is a per curiam affirmance with no published written opinion explaining the court’s rationale.
  • The judgment is not yet final pending disposition of any timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

As a per curiam affirmance without written explanation, this decision provides no new precedential guidance and does not establish legal principles applicable beyond the parties’ dispute. The affirmed judgment concludes the appellate review of the underlying matter, though the parties retain the right to file a motion for rehearing before the decision becomes final.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top