Wilson v. State — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Aaron M. Wilson v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Osterhaus, C.J.; Lewis, J.; Winokur, J.
Date Decided
August 17, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1934
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Aaron M. Wilson, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Alachua County, where Judge James M. Colaw presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the circuit court’s ruling, Wilson’s appellate arguments, or the State’s response.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Lewis and Winokur concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The disposition was per curiam and contained no written analysis.
  • The opinion states that it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal with an affirmance, subject to any timely and authorized post-decision motion. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance about the legal issues presented or the basis for the affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top