Wright — affirmed the criminal judgment without a written explanation

Case
Marquarius Ja’Qual Wright v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Jay, C.J.; Lambert, J.; MacIver, J.
Date Decided
August 24, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-1026
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Marquarius Ja’Qual Wright appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Brevard County in lower-tribunal case number 05-2021-CF-055834-A. Circuit Judge Kathryn M. Speicher presided below.

The Fifth District’s corrected opinion does not describe the charges, facts, arguments on appeal, or procedural history beyond identifying the appeal and the lower court.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning and announced no express rule of law. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Lambert and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the judgment against Wright.
  • The decision was issued as a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion does not identify the appellate issues or disclose the court’s reasoning.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact. Because the appellate court supplied no factual or legal analysis, the opinion offers no explanation of why Wright’s arguments failed and announces no express legal principle for future cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top