Zuniga v. State — affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Raymond A. Zuniga v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
LaROSE; MORRIS; LABRIT
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-2667
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Raymond A. Zuniga appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Kimberly K. Fernandez presided. The opinion does not identify the underlying charges, the ruling challenged on appeal, or the arguments Zuniga raised.

Zuniga was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office. The State of Florida was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. Judges LaRose, Morris, and Labrit concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court affirmed without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rule of law or issue-specific analysis.

Why It Matters

Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion resolves Zuniga’s appeal but offers no guidance about the underlying legal issues. Its practical significance is therefore limited primarily to the parties and the disposition of this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top