Carrington v. Hampton Point Owner GA — dismissed an untimely appeal from a consent dispossessory judgment

Case
Shiana Carrington v. Hampton Point Owner GA LLC d/b/a Hampton Pointe
Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Judge
Not specified
Date Decided
October 9, 2026
Docket No.
A27D0177
Topics
Landlord-Tenant; Dispossessory Appeals; Appellate Jurisdiction; Consent Judgments
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

In a dispossessory action, the magistrate court entered a consent order on September 8, 2026, requiring Shiana Carrington to pay past-due rent and issuing a writ of possession.

Carrington filed an application for discretionary appeal in the Court of Appeals of Georgia on September 23, 2026, 15 days after entry of the consent order.

The Court’s Holding

The Court of Appeals dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction. Appeals from magistrate court judgments must proceed as de novo appeals to the state or superior court, and dispossessory appeals must be filed within seven days after entry of judgment. Because Carrington filed after that deadline, she lost her right to appeal.

The court declined to transfer the application for consideration by the appropriate trial court. It also concluded that Carrington had waived her appellate rights by consenting to the magistrate court judgment, citing the rule that a litigant generally may not challenge a judgment that the litigant procured or helped procure unless consent was obtained through fraud or mistake.

Key Takeaways

  • A magistrate court judgment is reviewed through a de novo appeal to the state or superior court, not through a discretionary application filed directly in the Court of Appeals.
  • The deadline to appeal a judgment in a dispossessory action is seven days, rather than the generally applicable 30-day period for magistrate court appeals.
  • Consent to a judgment generally waives the right to challenge that judgment on appeal, subject to the recognized exception for consent obtained through fraud or mistake.

Why It Matters

The order underscores that the specialized seven-day deadline for dispossessory appeals is jurisdictional. Filing within the ordinary 30-day period applicable to many magistrate court appeals is insufficient.

It also shows that transfer is unavailable when the receiving state or superior court would itself lack appellate jurisdiction because the appeal was untimely, particularly where the challenged judgment was entered by consent.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top