Johnson v. Fun Spot America — Georgia appeals court dismisses late discretionary appeal

Case
Herman L. Johnson v. Fun Spot America of Atlanta, Inc.
Court
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Judge
Not specified
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
A27D0081
Topics
Appellate jurisdiction; Discretionary appeals; Timeliness
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Herman L. Johnson sought review of a trial court’s June 2, 2026 order denying his motion to vacate judgment.

Johnson previously filed a direct appeal from that order. On July 21, 2026, the Court of Appeals dismissed that appeal because Johnson did not follow Georgia’s discretionary-appeal procedure. He then filed this application for discretionary appeal on August 20, 2026.

The Court’s Holding

The Court of Appeals dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction. A discretionary application must be filed within 30 days after entry of the order being appealed under OCGA § 5-6-35(d).

Johnson filed his application 79 days after the June 2 order. Because the statutory filing deadline is jurisdictional, the court held it could not accept the untimely application.

Key Takeaways

  • A discretionary appeal application must be filed within 30 days of the appealed order.
  • The statutory deadline under OCGA § 5-6-35(d) is jurisdictional.
  • A prior dismissal of an improper direct appeal does not make a later, untimely discretionary application viable.

Why It Matters

The order underscores that parties must use the correct appellate vehicle and meet its filing deadline. Once the 30-day deadline for a discretionary application expires, the appellate court lacks authority to consider the application.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top