R. Fleming Weaver Jr v. Robert Doe — Georgia appeals court denies interlocutory appeal application

Case
A27I0074. R. FLEMING WEAVER JR v. ROBERT DOE.
Court
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Judge
Not specified
Date Decided
November 06, 2026
Docket No.
A27I0074
Topics
Interlocutory appeal; Application denied; Procedural disposition
Source
Read the full opinion

Disposition Notice

This is an outcome-only order, not a reasoned appellate opinion. The Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia issued the order in Atlanta on November 06, 2026. The introductory text states: “The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order.” The case is identified in the document as “A27I0074. R. FLEMING WEAVER JR v. ROBERT DOE.”

Background

The document identifies an application for interlocutory appeal in R. Fleming Weaver Jr v. Robert Doe. It does not describe the underlying dispute, identify the ruling sought to be appealed, or set out the parties’ legal arguments. No factual narrative, statutes, rules, cases, or other authorities are supplied.

The order lists “LC NUMBERS:” followed by “SU19CV0378.” The document does not expand that abbreviation or name the lower court. It also does not identify a judge or panel, record a vote, or include a concurrence or dissent.

The Court’s Holding

The operative disposition states: “Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.” The application for interlocutory appeal was therefore denied. The document supplies no reasons for that denial and no substantive analysis of any underlying issue.

This disposition should not be characterized as a merits decision, an affirmance or reversal of a lower-court ruling, or a determination of either party’s liability. The order does not provide further directions or discuss the procedural consequences of the denial beyond the denial itself.

Key Takeaways

  • The Court of Appeals denied the Application for Interlocutory Appeal in docket A27I0074.
  • The order is dated November 06, 2026, in Atlanta and lists lower-court number SU19CV0378.
  • No public reasoning, legal authorities, identified appellate judges, vote, concurrence, or dissent appears in the document.

Why It Matters

The document establishes the procedural outcome of the application but does not explain the court’s reasoning or resolve the merits of the underlying dispute. Its certification states: “I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.” The Clerk’s Office certification is located in Atlanta and dated November 06, 2026.

The certification further refers to the clerk’s signature and the court seal being affixed on the stated day and year. The printed text identifies the signer only as “Clerk”; the handwritten signature is not reliably readable as a name, and no signer should be inferred from it.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top