Background
Trula Anderson was the plaintiff and counterclaim defendant in a civil case against Truman Lee Ketchmark, the defendant and counterclaimant, in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit.
Ketchmark, representing himself on appeal, filed a motion for reconsideration on August 27, 2026. The Intermediate Court of Appeals considered the motion, its supporting papers, and the record.
The Court’s Holding
The court denied Ketchmark’s motion for reconsideration.
Citing Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b), the court concluded that Ketchmark presented no point of law or fact that the court had overlooked or misapprehended.
Key Takeaways
- The Intermediate Court of Appeals denied Ketchmark’s August 27, 2026 motion for reconsideration.
- The court applied Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b).
- The court found no overlooked or misapprehended point of law or fact.
Why It Matters
The order reflects the specific inquiry the court applied to Ketchmark’s reconsideration request: whether he identified a point of law or fact that the court overlooked or misapprehended. The court concluded that he did not.