Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co. v. Eala — Hawaii Supreme Court rejects certiorari petition

Case
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association fka The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee for Residential Asset Mortgage Products, Inc., Mortgage Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-RS1 v. Edwin Paet Eala and Carolina Cabudol-Eala, et al.
Court
Supreme Court of Hawaii
Judge
Vladimir P. Devens; Sabrina S. McKenna; Todd W. Eddins; Lisa M. Ginoza; Kauanoe A.D. Jackson
Date Decided
October 5, 2026
Docket No.
SCWC-25-0000365
Topics
certiorari; appellate procedure; mortgage litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company was the respondent and plaintiff-appellee in proceedings involving Edwin Paet Eala and Carolina Cabudol-Eala, the petitioners and defendants-appellants.

After proceedings in the Intermediate Court of Appeals, the Ealas filed an application for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of Hawaii on August 14, 2026.

The Court’s Holding

The Supreme Court of Hawaii rejected the Ealas’ application for a writ of certiorari.

The order did not state reasons for rejecting review or address the merits of the underlying dispute.

Key Takeaways

  • The Hawaii Supreme Court declined to grant certiorari.
  • The order leaves the Intermediate Court of Appeals proceedings undisturbed.
  • The court issued a brief order without a merits analysis.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this attempt to obtain discretionary review in the Hawaii Supreme Court. Because the order provides no reasoning, it does not announce a substantive legal rule.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top