Bates v. Cahill — Hawaiʻi Supreme Court dismissed mandamus and prohibition petition

Case
Michael Adrian Kahaleala Bates; Anthony L. Ranken; Alex A. Edrenkin; and John E. Thickstun v. The Honorable Peter T. Cahill, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, and State of Hawaiʻi, by the Attorney General in capacity as Trustee
Court
Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi
Judge
McKenna, Acting C.J. (Neil Abercrombie, 2011); Eddins, J. (David Ige, 2020); Ginoza, J. (Josh Green, 2024); Circuit Judge Morikone (David Y. Ige, 2021); Circuit Judge Tomasa (Chief Justice Mark E. Recktenwald, 2025)
Date Decided
November 2, 2026
Docket No.
SCPW-26-0000480
Topics
Mandamus; Prohibition; Original proceeding; Maui fire litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Michael Adrian Kahaleala Bates, Anthony L. Ranken, Alex A. Edrenkin, and John E. Thickstun filed an original petition in the Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi seeking writs of mandamus and prohibition.

The petition named Circuit Court Judge Peter T. Cahill as the respondent judge and the State of Hawaiʻi, through the Attorney General in the capacity of trustee, as a respondent. The underlying circuit-court matter was Case No. 2CSP-23-0000057.

The Court’s Holding

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition after considering the petition and record.

The court cited Matter of Maui Fire Cases, No. SCAP-26-0000484, 2026 WL 2936776 (Haw. Sept. 30, 2026). It also dismissed all pending motions as moot.

Key Takeaways

  • The requested extraordinary writs were dismissed.
  • The court relied on its prior decision in Matter of Maui Fire Cases.
  • Pending motions were dismissed as moot.

Why It Matters

The order ends this original writ proceeding without granting mandamus or prohibition relief. Its citation to Matter of Maui Fire Cases identifies that decision as the basis for the dismissal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top