Cabral v. Pali Momi Medical Center — court corrected clerical errors in its prior opinion

Case
Leslie Cabral, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Leonard Cabral, Jr.; Leonard Cabral, Sr.; and Nicholas Cabral v. Pali Momi Medical Center
Court
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Judge
Nakasone, Chief Judge; Hiraoka, Judge; Wadsworth, Judge
Date Decided
August 19, 2026
Docket No.
CAAP-24-0000431
Topics
Appellate procedure; Clerical correction; Medical center
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

The Intermediate Court of Appeals had entered an opinion in this case on August 18, 2026.

On August 19, 2026, the court issued an amended order of correction addressing two errors in that opinion. The order did not describe the underlying dispute or alter the opinion’s disposition.

The Court’s Holding

The court ordered two textual corrections to its August 18 opinion. First, it replaced “principle” with “principal” in a discussion of when a principal is “ipso facto liable” for an agent’s actions.

Second, the court revised a citation to Ricapor-Hall v. Philip Morris USA Inc. so that the blank page numbers appeared as underscores. The clerk was directed to notify publishing agencies of the changes.

Key Takeaways

  • This amended order corrects wording and citation formatting in a previously issued opinion.
  • The order does not state or modify the underlying merits holding.
  • The appellate clerk must notify publishing agencies of the corrections.

Why It Matters

The order ensures that the published opinion uses the correct agency-law term and accurately formats a cited decision. It is a clerical correction order, not a new merits ruling.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top