Ford v. Board of Appeals — Hawai‘i Supreme Court rejected certiorari review

Case
Lawrence Ford, et al. v. Board of Appeals, County of Hawai‘i, et al.
Court
Supreme Court of the State of Hawai‘i
Judge
Vladimir P. Devens (Josh Green, 2023); Sabrina S. McKenna (Neil Abercrombie, 2011)
Date Decided
August 10, 2026
Docket No.
SCWC-25-0000005
Topics
Certiorari; Appellate procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Petitioners Lawrence Ford, John Koontz, Don Davis, Phillip Koszarek, William Robert Gage, Jr., and Rebecca S. Gage sought review by the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai‘i.

They filed an application for a writ of certiorari on June 18, 2026. The order identifies two Intermediate Court of Appeals case numbers, CAAP-25-0000005 and CAAP-25-0000004, and circuit court case number 3CCV-23-0000200, but provides no description of the underlying dispute or the Intermediate Court of Appeals’ ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Hawai‘i Supreme Court rejected the petitioners’ application for a writ of certiorari.

The order does not explain the court’s reasoning or address the merits of the underlying case.

Key Takeaways

  • The petitioners’ June 18, 2026 certiorari application was rejected.
  • The order provides no substantive analysis or explanation for the disposition.
  • The order does not describe the underlying dispute or the ruling for which review was sought.

Why It Matters

The rejection ends the petitioners’ attempt to obtain Hawai‘i Supreme Court review through this certiorari application. Because the court issued a summary order without reasoning, the order establishes no stated substantive holding beyond the denial of further review.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top