Mola v. Lopez-Ruiz — Hawaii Supreme Court rejected certiorari application

Case
Vincenzo Mola v. Indira Lopez-Ruiz
Court
Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi
Judge
Vladimir P. Devens; Sabrina S. McKenna; Todd W. Eddins; Lisa M. Ginoza; Kauanoe A.D. Jackson
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
SCWC-24-0000802
Topics
Certiorari; Appellate Procedure; Domestic Relations
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Vincenzo Mola was the plaintiff and counterclaim defendant-appellee, and Indira Lopez-Ruiz was the defendant and counterclaim plaintiff-appellant, in a matter identified as Case No. 1DRC-24-0006118.

The proceeding reached the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi on certiorari from the Intermediate Court of Appeals. Lopez-Ruiz filed an application for a writ of certiorari on September 1, 2026.

The Court’s Holding

The Hawaiʻi Supreme Court rejected Lopez-Ruiz’s application for a writ of certiorari.

The court’s order did not provide reasoning or address the merits of the parties’ underlying dispute.

Key Takeaways

  • The court rejected Lopez-Ruiz’s certiorari application.
  • The application had been filed on September 1, 2026.
  • The order supplied no explanation for the rejection and did not discuss the underlying claims or counterclaims.

Why It Matters

The order records the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court’s decision not to accept the certiorari application in this domestic-relations matter. Because the order contains no merits analysis, it establishes no stated rule or reasoning beyond the rejection itself.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top