Wells Fargo Bank v. Yee — Dismissed the appeal with prejudice by stipulation

Case
Wells Fargo Bank N.A., as Trustee for the Certificateholders of Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2007-FRE1 Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates v. Randall M.L. Yee, Special Administrator of the Estate of Elias Virgilio Macapulay, et al.
Court
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Judge
Clyde J. Wadsworth; Sonja M.P. McCullen; Daniel M. Gluck
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
CAAP-24-0000445
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Voluntary Dismissal, Stipulation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Defendant-Appellant Albina Visitacino Macapulay appealed from a May 28, 2024 judgment of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit. Her notice of appeal was filed on June 27, 2024, and the appeal was docketed in the Hawaiʻi Intermediate Court of Appeals.

On August 10, 2026, Macapulay filed a stipulation, signed by counsel for all appearing parties, seeking dismissal of her appeal with prejudice. The parties agreed to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.

The Court’s Holding

The Intermediate Court of Appeals approved the parties’ stipulation under Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b). The court found that the appeal had been docketed and that all appearing parties had agreed through counsel to the requested dismissal.

The court dismissed the appeal with prejudice. It also ordered each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

Key Takeaways

  • A docketed appeal may be dismissed through a stipulation that satisfies Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 42(b).
  • The dismissal was with prejudice, ending Albina Visitacino Macapulay’s appeal from the May 28, 2024 judgment.
  • The parties agreed to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.

Why It Matters

The order illustrates the procedure for ending a docketed Hawaiʻi appeal by agreement of all appearing parties. Because the court approved dismissal with prejudice, it did not reach or decide the merits of the underlying dispute.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top