In re Parentage of A.C. — Illinois appellate court upheld zero-income finding and higher child support

Case
In re Parentage of A.C., a Minor (Deborah C., Petitioner-Appellee v. Eric C., Respondent-Appellant)
Court
Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Judge
Presiding Justice Kennedy; Justice Jorgensen; Justice Birkett
Date Decided
August 17, 2026
Docket No.
2-25-0257
Topics
Child support; Gift income; Means-tested assistance; Parentage
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Deborah C. moved in January 2024 to modify child support after Eric C.’s income substantially increased and he stopped exercising visitation. At a February 2025 hearing, the parties agreed that the unreimbursed housing and living expenses Deborah received from the adult with whom she lived had been valued at $26,870 annually. The circuit court initially treated those benefits as gift income and increased Eric’s obligation from $165 per week to $943.22 per month, retroactive to the filing date.

Deborah sought reconsideration, explaining that the earlier figure overstated car payments and arguing that her rent-free living arrangement was not income. She also received SNAP or TANF assistance and had previously been found medically unable to work. The circuit court reconsidered, assigned Deborah no income, and raised Eric’s support obligation to $1,134 per month, retroactive to January 29, 2024. Eric appealed.

The Court’s Holding

The appellate court affirmed. Under section 505(a)(3.3b) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, a parent with no gross income who receives only means-tested assistance is presumptively subject to a zero-dollar support order. The court held that the nonmonetary benefits Deborah received—free housing and other living expenses—were not income in these circumstances because they did not facilitate her ability to financially support the child.

The court distinguished cases treating recurring cash gifts as income because those gifts enhanced the recipient’s wealth and ability to support a child. Treating rent-free accommodations as income here would create an absurd result: a parent with no income who accepts charity for housing could lose the statute’s protection precisely because of that charity. Because Deborah had no gross income and received only means-tested assistance, the court did not reach Eric’s hearsay challenge to physicians’ letters concerning her inability to work.

Key Takeaways

  • Nonmonetary housing and living assistance is not necessarily child-support income.
  • For a parent otherwise qualifying under section 505(a)(3.3b), the question is whether the gift facilitates that parent’s ability to support the child.
  • The court left open whether rent-free accommodations may count as income when the zero-dollar-order provision does not otherwise apply.

Why It Matters

The decision applies Illinois’s zero-dollar child-support provision to a parent receiving means-tested assistance and living rent-free with another adult. It prevents informal housing charity from automatically being treated as income that defeats the statutory protection.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top