People v. Dambrell — Illinois appellate court affirms seven-year sentence after probation revocation

Case
The People of the State of Illinois v. Zacharia C. Dambrell
Court
Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District
Judge
Justice Hackett
Date Decided
October 13, 2026
Docket No.
5-24-0148
Topics
Sentencing; Probation revocation; Burglary; Plain error
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Zacharia C. Dambrell pleaded guilty to burglary after police found him removing copper plumbing from a building in Eldorado, Illinois. In 2020, he received 30 months of probation under a plea agreement.

While on probation, Dambrell failed to keep his probation office updated on his address and committed retail theft and aggravated battery. After a probation-violation hearing, the Saline County circuit court revoked probation and resentenced him for the original Class 2 burglary conviction to seven years in prison, the statutory maximum, followed by one year of mandatory supervised release.

The Court’s Holding

The appellate court affirmed. It held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the maximum sentence, which fell within the three-to-seven-year statutory range for burglary.

The trial court could consider Dambrell’s conduct while on probation when assessing his history, character, and rehabilitative potential. It also could consider deterrence, including the local problem of burglaries involving the theft of copper from vacant buildings. The record did not show that the court improperly relied on Dambrell’s new convictions or community harm as impermissible sentencing factors.

The court further found that the sentencing judge considered Dambrell’s mental-health and substance-abuse history, along with other mitigating evidence. Dambrell’s criminal history, repeated failures to appear, and commission of two felonies while on probation supported the sentence.

Key Takeaways

  • A court resentencing after probation revocation may consider conduct during probation in evaluating rehabilitation and character.
  • Deterrence is a proper aggravating factor when supported by the circumstances of the offense.
  • A maximum sentence within the statutory range will stand absent an abuse of discretion.

Why It Matters

The decision underscores the broad discretion Illinois trial courts retain when resentencing after probation revocation. A defendant’s intervening criminal conduct and failure to comply with probation can materially support a prison sentence for the original offense, even where mental-health and substance-abuse issues are presented in mitigation.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top