In the Interest of S.B. and M.B. — Grandparents could not appeal dismissal of termination case

Case
In the Interest of S.B. and M.B., Minor Children
Court
Iowa Court of Appeals
Judge
Greer, P.J.; Badding, J.; Sandy, J.
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
26-1169
Topics
Termination of parental rights; Standing; Grandparents; Juvenile law
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

S.B. and M.B. were removed from their parents’ care after a domestic-violence incident and had been out of the home for two years. The Iowa Department of Health and Human Services held legal custody and placed the children with their maternal grandparents in March 2024.

After the parents made little progress toward reunification, the State sought to terminate both parents’ rights. The juvenile court found statutory grounds for termination under Iowa Code section 232.116(1)(d), (f), and (h), but declined to terminate under the permissive exceptions in section 232.116(3)(a) and (c). The grandparents, who had intervened and were the children’s placement, appealed.

The Court’s Holding

The Iowa Court of Appeals held that the grandparents lacked standing to appeal the dismissal of the termination petitions. Although Iowa law permits an interested party aggrieved by a juvenile-court order to appeal, the grandparents did not have the necessary legal interest in the termination ruling.

The court found no authority allowing current-placement maternal grandparents to challenge a dismissal of a termination petition and cited Iowa authority holding that grandparents and foster or preadoptive parents do not have a protected legal interest in children sufficient to appeal parental-rights determinations. It affirmed the juvenile court and dismissed the appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • A child’s grandparents and current placement lack standing to appeal the dismissal of a termination-of-parental-rights petition absent a legally protected interest.
  • Finding statutory grounds for termination does not require termination when a juvenile court applies a permissive exception under Iowa Code section 232.116(3).
  • An appellate court may raise standing on its own initiative, even when the opposing parties do not brief the issue.

Why It Matters

The decision reinforces that relatives who care for children in state custody do not thereby obtain a right to litigate or appeal the termination of the parents’ rights. Their interest in the children’s welfare, while significant in practical terms, is not enough to confer appellate standing under Iowa juvenile law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top