Background
The proceedings comprised cross-appeals involving anonymous private parties and the Palestinian Authority and others. The appeals arose from judgments of the Jerusalem District Court in Civil Case 2079/08, issued on July 8, 2019, June 20, 2022, and April 20, 2025.
On September 14, 2026, the parties submitted a notice containing agreed terms designated as Appendix A. The Supreme Court’s brief decision addressed those agreed terms and their procedural effect.
The Court’s Holding
The Supreme Court gave the parties’ agreement in Appendix A the force of a judgment. The published opinion does not reproduce the agreement’s terms.
Accordingly, the Court ordered CA 6697/22 dismissed, directed that the deposit be returned to the depositor, made no order for costs, and ordered reimbursement of the filing fee in accordance with the applicable regulations. The decision was a final judgment in CA 6697/22 and a partial judgment in CA 6647/22.
Key Takeaways
- An agreement submitted by the parties as Appendix A was given the force of a judgment.
- CA 6697/22 was dismissed, while the ruling was expressly only a partial judgment in CA 6647/22.
- The Court awarded no costs and directed return of the deposit and reimbursement of the filing fee under the regulations.
Why It Matters
The decision records a consensual resolution and its immediate procedural consequences rather than a merits ruling on the underlying dispute. Because the agreement itself is not included in the published text, the opinion should not be read as establishing substantive legal principles beyond the disposition stated by the Court.