Fabre v. Plummer — Supervisory writ denied

Case
Brian Fabre and Leighann Fabre v. Thaddeus Plummer and GoAuto Insurance Company
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Judge
Wolfe; Stromberg; Balfour
Date Decided
October 5, 2026
Docket No.
2026 CW 0726
Topics
Supervisory Writ, Insurance Litigation, Civil Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Brian Fabre and Leighann Fabre filed suit against Thaddeus Plummer and GoAuto Insurance Company in the 23rd Judicial District Court for Ascension Parish, docket number 128994.

GoAuto applied to the Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, for supervisory writs. The appellate court’s brief disposition does not identify the challenged ruling, describe the underlying facts, or state the arguments presented.

The Court’s Holding

The First Circuit denied GoAuto’s supervisory writ application.

The court provided no reasons for the denial and did not issue a substantive ruling on any legal question presented by the application.

Key Takeaways

  • GoAuto did not obtain supervisory relief from the challenged district-court ruling.
  • The writ disposition contains no factual analysis or legal reasoning.
  • The order does not disclose the specific issue GoAuto asked the appellate court to review.

Why It Matters

The denial leaves the challenged district-court ruling undisturbed at this stage of the litigation. Because the First Circuit gave no reasons, the order offers no precedential analysis or guidance on the merits of the underlying dispute.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top