Ford v. Prince of Peace Auto Sale — Court upholds rescission of used-car sale but eliminates mental-anguish damages

Case
Kendi Ford v. Prince of Peace Auto Sale LLC, et al.
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, Second Circuit
Judge
Pitman; Stephens; Ellender
Date Decided
August 26, 2026
Docket No.
57,000-CA
Topics
Redhibition; Used-car sales; Warranty waivers; Damages
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kendi Ford bought a 2008 Ford Fusion from Prince of Peace Auto Sale LLC for $4,500, making a $2,500 down payment and financing the balance. Ford testified that the vehicle was smoking during the test drive and that the dealer promised to repair it before delivery. Although the dealer performed some work, the vehicle continued to malfunction, eventually became inoperable, and was parked for months. Ford incurred repair-related expenses and stopped making payments.

The dealership repossessed the vehicle in December 2022 and later sold it for scrap. Ford sued for rescission, repair-related expenses, general damages, and attorney fees. The Monroe City Court rescinded the sale and awarded $3,382 in special damages, $5,000 in general damages, and $4,500 in attorney fees. The dealership appealed.

The Court’s Holding

The Second Circuit held that the appeal was timely because the record showed mailing of notice of the city-court judgment but did not show when the dealership received it. The court also upheld the finding that the dealer had not proved an effective waiver of the warranty against redhibitory defects. Although the contract and buyers guide stated that the sale was “as is,” the record contained no evidence that the waiver was brought to Ford’s attention or explained to her.

Deferring to the trial court’s credibility findings, the appellate court found no manifest error in its conclusion that the vehicle was not reasonably fit for ordinary use, that the dealer knew of the defect and failed to disclose or remedy it, and that Ford could not repair it. It therefore affirmed rescission-related special damages and statutory attorney fees. But it vacated the $5,000 general-damages award: nonpecuniary damages in a redhibition case require proof that the buyer sought to satisfy a significant nonpecuniary interest, and the record showed no such interest in buying the vehicle.

Key Takeaways

  • An “as is” used-car sale does not by itself establish a valid waiver of the redhibition warranty.
  • A bad-faith seller may owe the price, qualifying expenses, damages, and attorney fees under Louisiana redhibition law.
  • Mental-anguish and inconvenience damages for a defective automobile require proof of a significant nonpecuniary purchase interest.

Why It Matters

The decision reinforces that dealers bear the burden of proving that a buyer knowingly waived redhibition protections. Written “as is” language is insufficient without evidence that the waiver was adequately disclosed or explained.

It also limits damages in defective-vehicle cases: even where a seller is found to have known of a defect, a buyer cannot recover general damages for distress or inconvenience without the specific nonpecuniary-interest showing required by Louisiana law.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top