Formation Federal Credit Union v. Abraham — Stay denied and writ application not considered because required documents were missing

Case
Formation Federal Credit Union v. Daniel Mark Abraham
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Judge
Theriot; Greene; Edwards
Date Decided
September 3, 2026
Docket No.
2026 CW 1152
Topics
Supervisory Writs; Appellate Procedure; Record Requirements
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Daniel Mark Abraham applied for supervisory writs arising from proceedings in the 19th Judicial District Court for East Baton Rouge Parish, case numbers 756194 and 780266. He also sought a stay from the Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit.

The application omitted several materials required by Rule 4-5(C) of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. The missing materials included the signed judgment, the pleadings on which the ruling was founded—including the petition—any district-court opposition, pertinent minutes, and the notice of intent and return-date order.

The Court’s Holding

The First Circuit denied the requested stay and declined to consider the supervisory-writ application because it did not include the documents required by Rule 4-5(C)(6), (8), (9), (10), and (11).

The court stated that it would not consider supplementation of the deficient application or an application for rehearing. Abraham may instead file a new, compliant writ application by October 5, 2026, provided it contains all pertinent documentation, complies with Rule 2-12.2, and includes a copy of the court’s ruling.

Key Takeaways

  • A supervisory-writ application must include the signed judgment and all pleadings and record materials required by the appellate rules.
  • The First Circuit will not cure this type of deficiency through supplementation or rehearing.
  • A new application may be filed by October 5, 2026, with the missing materials and a copy of the ruling.

Why It Matters

The ruling underscores that Louisiana appellate courts enforce writ-application record requirements strictly. Even without reaching the merits, an appellate court may deny interim relief and refuse to consider a supervisory writ when the applicant omits required documents.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top