In re Bell — Public-records writ denied because the judgment was appealable

Case
In re Lester Bell
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Judge
THERIOT (elected 2012); Greene (elected 2022)
Date Decided
August 5, 2026
Docket No.
2026 CW 0912
Topics
Public records, Appellate procedure, Supervisory writs
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Lester Bell sought public records under Louisiana’s Public Records Law, La. R.S. 44:1 et seq. On April 23, 2026, the 23rd Judicial District Court in Ascension Parish entered a judgment denying his request.

Bell applied to the Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, for supervisory writs. The appellate court considered whether writ review was the proper procedural route for challenging the district court’s judgment.

The Court’s Holding

The court denied the writ. It held that the April 23 judgment denying Bell’s public-records request was a final, appealable judgment under Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure articles 1841 and 2083(A).

The court explained that an appeal must be initiated by timely filing a motion for appeal in the district court, together with an order for the district judge’s signature stating the appeal’s return date. The applicable delays are set by Article 2087. Filing documents directly with the court of appeal does not suspend those appeal deadlines.

Key Takeaways

  • A judgment denying a request under Louisiana’s Public Records Law is a final, appealable judgment.
  • The appellant must file the motion and proposed appeal order in the district court within the applicable Article 2087 delays.
  • A filing made directly in the court of appeal does not stop the appeal period from running.

Why It Matters

The ruling emphasizes that parties challenging a final judgment in a Louisiana public-records case must use the ordinary appeal process rather than seek supervisory review as a substitute. A filing in the wrong court will not preserve or extend the deadline for taking an appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top